- I have developed a simple and elegant framework for non-abusive decision-making and have used it---experimented with it--- in the past couple of years. The only lacking element relates to ``long-term decisions and commitments.'' I have come up with partial answers, as to how to make decisions with long-term consequences, but I am not really satisfied with them.
- I first need to elaborate on an amazing connection between our inner world and the outside reality. When we dream, the amount of direct sensational input from outside world is minimum, and our mind constructs a dream-world populated by figures and `things' that resemble outside reality. People have speculated on the mechanism behind dreams and their function and purpose. I have an alternative view: The dream mechanism is always present in our mind, but it only comes into full blossom during some states of sleeping. In waking states, inputs from outside world are very powerful and dominate our dream-mechanism. In sleep, the dream mechanism becomes dominant and creates story lines and pseudo-sensations!
- Why/how is this important? We can all agree that in most dreams, the purpose/meaning/plot is mainly a production of our mind. When we see a person behave in a certain way, the reason (for it) lies within our own mind. It's not that person's will and wishes that appear in our dream, but what our mind attributes to, or projects on, that person.
- I learned the lesson in the previous paragraph the hard way. It took a year or two of my life. But that's another story.
- In wakefulness, we are under the illusion of interacting with real world, whereas we mix the outside reality with a lot of our own mind's attributes and projections. The only way that we can make sense of `outside' is by projecting `inside'. It is `impossible' to be fully awake!!!!
- We can use this ever-present link between inside and outside worlds. For example, when a person makes us really angry, it is useful to realize that the roots of our anger is in an internal conflict that is projected on the outside situation. Instead of being overly focused on changing the outside world, which is out of our control in many ways, we can turn our attention to learning about our inside world and its conflicts.
- A long-term decision, in the inside world, corresponds to a long-term relationship, in the outside world. One possibility is that one part of our mind (for example, the rational and logical part or the emotional part) makes a decision and then uses our `willpower' to follow through the decision. In outside world, a relationship (say a family) can be dominated by one figure (either the father-rational figure or the mother-emotional, for example) and would be forced to behave a certain way.
- Just as weaker members of a group can sabotage the leader's decisions, in our inside world too the weaker (subordinate) parts can undermine the dominant part's decisions. That 's a much too common situation when we make a decision but cannot go through with it. Or worse, we can see what's the best and most rational choice for us, but something prevents us from doing that!
- The best forms of long-term relationships exhibit an element of respect for all members of the group, even those who are weak and seemingly useless. All members are `heard' even though in every situation there is ultimately one choice to be made and some members end up sacrificing their wishes. The art of `listening' is crucial here ...
- I believe that some form of internal/external listening is very important when we try to make long-term decisions and commitments. I am not sure exactly how.
PS 1. I just watched this TED talk and it seems relevant to my points:
PS 2. I solved the problem. Things came together after the evening tennis. It may take a while to put it into word coherently: I tried to explain it to Sima today and it made some sense, but needs more work. I am happy and excited.