Wednesday, August 16, 2006

Fwd: Questions & Answers


FYI:

>>> 8/16/2006 2:30 PM >>>

Dear all:

In response to many questions I received regarding Reunion 2006, I have
prepared the following Questions & Answers. Please note that this is just my own
response and doesn't represent any official SUTA position.

Regards,

Fredun Hojabri


Questions & Answers
Regarding REUNION 2006

Q-1: Why the Reunion 2006 was held in US?
A: SUTA’s Reunions are for all members and not for members in a specific
country. In the last two Reunions many members living in US were not able to
attend the Reunions because they had visa problems too!
Graduate students and young professional members with F, J and H visas were
not able to travel outside US, because for reentering they had to apply for
new visa.
For this reason it was natural for SUTA, as a California based organization,
to have another Reunion in California.
Q-2: Didn't SUTA know that traveling to US is very costly for members in
Iran?
A: Yes, but the same is true for members living in US to travel, e.g., to
Europe.
Apparently cost was not a decisive issue, as during the first two weeks of
registration more than 300 registered to participate in the Reunion 2006 from
Iran.
Q-3: Did SUTA promise to get visa for participants?
A: No, from the starts we told the members that USA is different from Canada
and Germany. While we had the cooperation of the Canadian and German
embassies for Reunion 2002 and 2004, we had no contact or promise of cooperation
from the State Department or the US consulates, although we had written to them
and informed them of our gathering in Santa Clara. We said that we would only
provide the participants with an invitation letter to apply for visa.
We were naturally very pleased when we saw that the consulates accepted more
than 150 visa applications from our participants.
Q-4: Were participants from Iran detained because they were coming to SUTA’s
gathering?
A: The concern of US security agencies about Reunion 2006 was not because of
SUTA, but because of participation of large number of members from Iran.
But according to the Bylaws, membership in SUTA is open to all associates of
Sharif (Aryamehr) University of Technology and we SUTA cannot function in
any other way.
Q-5: Didn't SUTA expect that US will not allow participation of members from
Iran?
A. No, all indications up to the last few days before the Reunion were
positive.
We don't think that anybody could predict Lebanon war, UN Security Council’s
Ultimatum to Iran, and the discovery of terrorists attack in UK, all just a
few days before the Reunion 2006!
Q-6: Why SUTA that was aware of the visa problems, has invited members from
Iran to participate in Reunion 2006?
A: We cannot imagine organizing a Reunion without participation of our
members in Iran. What would our members say if we had excluded members in Iran
from Reunion 2006?
Q-7: Can the US Government be sued for physical pains, psychological stress
and financial loss of the deported participants?
A: Lawyers advising us on this issue believe that the deported participants
have to initiate any action, but the chances of success are not great. The
security laws passed recently give the Federal Government free hand to bar any
visitors, and at anytime, from entering US for national security reasons.
Such a law suite will be very expensive and takes a long time.
The Iranian Government has also recommended that the deported participants
file suite in Iranian courts.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Clear Shallow Water

I started reading this novel, `` The Driver ,'' by Hart Hanson , and I did not like it much and decided to stop. But then I came ba...